Open AccessEnvironmental DNA analysis as a non‐invasive quantitative tool for reproductive migration of a threatened endemic fish in rivers
Author(s) -
Maruyama Atsushi,
Sugatani Kousuke,
Watanabe Kazuki,
Yamanaka Hiroki,
Imamura Akio
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
ecology and evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.17
H-Index - 63
ISSN - 2045-7758
DOI - 10.1002/ece3.4653
Subject(s) - environmental dna , threatened species , endangered species , electrofishing , habitat , tributary , population , biology , fishery , fish migration , ecology , freshwater fish , population dynamics of fisheries , fishing , fish <actinopterygii> , geography , biodiversity , demography , cartography , sociology
Quantitative information regarding reproduction is essential for conserving endangered animals; however, some conventional quantitative methods can be damaging to the target population and their habitats. In the present study, the reproductive migration of a threatened endemic fish, three‐lips ( Opsariichthys uncirostris uncirostris ), was non‐invasively monitored by quantitative PCR of species‐specific environmental DNA (eDNA), the usefulness of which has been not sufficiently explored. Water sampling and from‐shore visual inspection were performed weekly along a tributary of Lake Biwa (Japan), where adult fish seasonally migrate upstream to reproduce as well as at lake sites near the river mouth. Species‐specific eDNA was collected at all locations at times when the fish were visually observed and at certain sites where the fish were not observed. Log‐transformed individual counts from visual inspection were positively correlated with log‐transformed eDNA concentration in the river sites, indicating that eDNA analysis can be a reliable quantitative tool for fish abundance in rivers. Furthermore, distance from the lake did not influence eDNA concentration, suggesting that eDNA transport by river flow had a negligible effect on eDNA quantification. Both eDNA concentration and individual counts gradually increased from May–July, and decreased in August. Importantly, eDNA analysis showed that the fish occupied more habitats in the peak reproductive season and stayed for longer time at any given site. An additional underwater survey confirmed unexpected eDNA detections as true positives. eDNA analysis has great potential to quantitatively monitor reproductive fish migrations under certain conditions.