z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Biomass carbon storages and carbon sequestration potentials of the Grain for Green Program‐Covered Forests in China
Author(s) -
Wang Kaibo,
Hu Dongfeng,
Deng Juan,
Shangguan Zhouping,
Deng Lei
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
ecology and evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.17
H-Index - 63
ISSN - 2045-7758
DOI - 10.1002/ece3.4228
Subject(s) - carbon sequestration , carbon sink , biomass (ecology) , carbon fibers , environmental science , china , agroforestry , forestry , ecology , agronomy , climate change , geography , biology , carbon dioxide , mathematics , archaeology , algorithm , composite number
The Grain for Green Program ( GGP ) was the most all‐embracing program of ecological reconstruction implemented in China. To estimate carbon storages and carbon sequestration potentials of the GGP forests, the study presented in the paper collected data spanning from 1999 to 2010, such as tree species, tree planting area relevant to the GGP , empirical growth curves suitable for different planted tree species in China, as well as wood density ( WD ), biomass expansion factor ( BEF ), carbon fraction ( CF ) of different trees species, and estimated the carbon storages of the biomasses of GGP forests from 1999 to 2050. It showed that the total carbon storage of the biomass of GGP forests was 320.29 Tg upon the GGP completion in 2010; the total carbon sequestration is higher during the early GGP ‐implementation stage than at the late GGP ‐implementation stage, and the annual mean carbon sequestration of GGP forests was 26.69 Tg/year. The potential of GGP forests as carbon sink presented an increasing increment. In China, the potential increments of GGP forests as carbon sinks were estimated to be 397.34, 604.00, 725.53, and 808.90 Tg in 2020, 2030, 2040, and 2050, respectively, and the carbon sequestration rates were 1.72, 0.89, 0.52, and 0.36 Mg ha −1  year −1 , respectively, corresponding to 2010s, 2020s, 2030s, and 2040s. Therefore, the GGP forests had bigger carbon sequestration capacities and potentials in China.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here