z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Twelve fundamental life histories evolving through allocation‐dependent fecundity and survival
Author(s) -
Johansson Jacob,
Brännström Åke,
Metz Johan A. J.,
Dieckmann Ulf
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
ecology and evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.17
H-Index - 63
ISSN - 2045-7758
DOI - 10.1002/ece3.3730
Subject(s) - reproduction , biology , fecundity , indeterminate growth , organism , diversity (politics) , resource allocation , investment (military) , life history theory , ecology , life history , economics , evolutionary biology , demography , genetics , population , sociology , politics , anthropology , law , political science , crop , market economy , ideotype
An organism's life history is closely interlinked with its allocation of energy between growth and reproduction at different life stages. Theoretical models have established that diminishing returns from reproductive investment promote strategies with simultaneous investment into growth and reproduction (indeterminate growth) over strategies with distinct phases of growth and reproduction (determinate growth). We extend this traditional, binary classification by showing that allocation‐dependent fecundity and mortality rates allow for a large diversity of optimal allocation schedules. By analyzing a model of organisms that allocate energy between growth and reproduction, we find twelve types of optimal allocation schedules, differing qualitatively in how reproductive allocation increases with body mass. These twelve optimal allocation schedules include types with different combinations of continuous and discontinuous increase in reproduction allocation, in which phases of continuous increase can be decelerating or accelerating. We furthermore investigate how this variation influences growth curves and the expected maximum life span and body size. Our study thus reveals new links between eco‐physiological constraints and life‐history evolution and underscores how allocation‐dependent fitness components may underlie biological diversity.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here