
Dealing with paralogy in RAD seq data: in silico detection and single nucleotide polymorphism validation in Robinia pseudoacacia L.
Author(s) -
Verdu Cindy F.,
Guichoux Erwan,
Quevauvillers Samuel,
De Thier Olivier,
Laizet Yec'han,
Delcamp Adline,
Gévaudant Frédéric,
Monty Arnaud,
Porté Annabel J.,
Lejeune Philippe,
Lassois Ludivine,
Mariette Stéphanie
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
ecology and evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.17
H-Index - 63
ISSN - 2045-7758
DOI - 10.1002/ece3.2466
Subject(s) - in silico , robinia , single nucleotide polymorphism , computational biology , genetics , biology , polymorphism (computer science) , nucleotide , genotype , gene , botany
The RAD seq technology allows researchers to efficiently develop thousands of polymorphic loci across multiple individuals with little or no prior information on the genome. However, many questions remain about the biases inherent to this technology. Notably, sequence misalignments arising from paralogy may affect the development of single nucleotide polymorphism ( SNP ) markers and the estimation of genetic diversity. We evaluated the impact of putative paralog loci on genetic diversity estimation during the development of SNP s from a RAD seq dataset for the nonmodel tree species Robinia pseudoacacia L. We sequenced nine genotypes and analyzed the frequency of putative paralogous RAD loci as a function of both the depth of coverage and the mismatch threshold allowed between loci. Putative paralogy was detected in a very variable number of loci, from 1% to more than 20%, with the depth of coverage having a major influence on the result. Putative paralogy artificially increased the observed degree of polymorphism and resulting estimates of diversity. The choice of the depth of coverage also affected diversity estimation and SNP validation: A low threshold decreased the chances of detecting minor alleles while a high threshold increased allelic dropout. SNP validation was better for the low threshold (4×) than for the high threshold (18×) we tested. Using the strategy developed here, we were able to validate more than 80% of the SNP s tested by means of individual genotyping, resulting in a readily usable set of 330 SNP s, suitable for use in population genetics applications.