z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A simulation study of sample size for DNA barcoding
Author(s) -
Luo Arong,
Lan Haiqiang,
Ling Cheng,
Zhang Aibing,
Shi Lei,
Ho Simon Y. W.,
Zhu Chaodong
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
ecology and evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.17
H-Index - 63
ISSN - 2045-7758
DOI - 10.1002/ece3.1846
Subject(s) - dna barcoding , sample size determination , pairwise comparison , biology , estimator , statistics , evolutionary biology , population , genetic diversity , sample (material) , population size , sampling (signal processing) , haplotype , genetics , computer science , mathematics , genotype , gene , demography , physics , filter (signal processing) , sociology , computer vision , thermodynamics
Abstract For some groups of organisms, DNA barcoding can provide a useful tool in taxonomy, evolutionary biology, and biodiversity assessment. However, the efficacy of DNA barcoding depends on the degree of sampling per species, because a large enough sample size is needed to provide a reliable estimate of genetic polymorphism and for delimiting species. We used a simulation approach to examine the effects of sample size on four estimators of genetic polymorphism related to DNA barcoding: mismatch distribution, nucleotide diversity, the number of haplotypes, and maximum pairwise distance. Our results showed that mismatch distributions derived from subsamples of ≥20 individuals usually bore a close resemblance to that of the full dataset. Estimates of nucleotide diversity from subsamples of ≥20 individuals tended to be bell‐shaped around that of the full dataset, whereas estimates from smaller subsamples were not. As expected, greater sampling generally led to an increase in the number of haplotypes. We also found that subsamples of ≥20 individuals allowed a good estimate of the maximum pairwise distance of the full dataset, while smaller ones were associated with a high probability of underestimation. Overall, our study confirms the expectation that larger samples are beneficial for the efficacy of DNA barcoding and suggests that a minimum sample size of 20 individuals is needed in practice for each population.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here