z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Allometric scaling relationship between above‐ and below‐ground biomass within and across five woody seedlings
Author(s) -
Cheng Dongliang,
Ma Yuzhu,
Zhong Quanling,
Xu Weifeng
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
ecology and evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.17
H-Index - 63
ISSN - 2045-7758
DOI - 10.1002/ece3.1184
Subject(s) - interspecific competition , allometry , scaling , intraspecific competition , biomass (ecology) , biomass partitioning , evergreen , biology , ecology , mathematics , geometry
Allometric biomass allocation theory predicts that leaf biomass ( M L ) scaled isometrically with stem ( M S ) and root ( M R ) biomass, and thus above‐ground biomass (leaf and stem) ( M A ) and root ( M R ) scaled nearly isometrically with below‐ground biomass (root) for tree seedlings across a wide diversity of taxa. Furthermore, prior studies also imply that scaling constant should vary with species. However, litter is known about whether such invariant isometric scaling exponents hold for intraspecific biomass allocation, and how variation in scaling constants influences the interspecific scaling relationship between above‐ and below‐ground biomass. Biomass data of seedlings from five evergreen species were examined to test scaling relationships among biomass components across and within species. Model Type II regression was used to compare the numerical values of scaling exponents and constants among leaf, stem, root, and above‐ to below‐ground biomass. The results indicated that M L and M S scaled in an isometric or a nearly isometric manner with M R , as well as M A to M R for five woody species. Significant variation was observed in the Y‐ intercepts of the biomass scaling curves, resulting in the divergence for intraspecific scaling and interspecific scaling relationships for M L versus M S and M L versus M R , but not for M S versus M R and M A versus M R . We conclude, therefore, that a nearly isometric scaling relationship of M A versus M R holds true within each of the studied woody species and across them irrespective the negative scaling relationship between leaf and stem.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here