z-logo
Premium
Prevalence of DSM‐5 avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a pediatric gastroenterology healthcare network
Author(s) -
Eddy Kamryn T.,
Thomas Jennifer J.,
Hastings Elizabeth,
Edkins Katherine,
Lamont Evan,
Nevins Caitlin M.,
Patterson Rebecca M.,
Murray Helen B.,
BryantWaugh Rachel,
Becker Anne E.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
international journal of eating disorders
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.785
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1098-108X
pISSN - 0276-3478
DOI - 10.1002/eat.22350
Subject(s) - psychosocial , anorexia nervosa , eating disorders , pediatric gastroenterology , medical diagnosis , pediatrics , medicine , psychiatry , anxiety , population , not otherwise specified , bulimia nervosa , disease , environmental health , pathology
Objective Few published studies have evaluated the clinical utility of new diagnostic criteria for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), a DSM‐5 reformulation of feeding and eating disorder of infancy or early childhood. We examined the prevalence of ARFID and inter‐rater reliability of its diagnostic criteria in a pediatric gastrointestinal sample. Method We conducted a retrospective chart review of 2,231 consecutive new referrals (ages 8–18 years) to 19 Boston‐area pediatric gastroenterology clinics for evidence of DSM‐5 ARFID. Results We identified 33 (1.5%) ARFID cases; 22 of whom (67%) were male. Most were characterized by insufficient intake/little interest in feeding ( n  = 19) or limited diet due to sensory features of the food ( n  = 7). An additional 54 cases (2.4%) met one or more ARFID criteria but there was insufficient information in the medical record to confer or exclude the diagnosis. Diagnostic agreement between coders was adequate (κ = 0.72). Common challenges were (i) distinguishing between diagnoses of ARFID and anorexia nervosa or anxiety disorders; (ii) determination of whether the severity of the eating/feeding disturbance was sufficient to warrant diagnosis in the presence of another medical or psychiatric disorder; and (iii) assessment of psychosocial impairment related to eating/feeding problems. Discussion In a pediatric treatment‐seeking sample where ARFID features were common, cases meeting full criteria were rare, suggesting that the diagnosis is not over‐inclusive even in a population where eating/feeding difficulties are expected. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals Inc. (Inc. Int J Eat Disord 2015; 48:464–470)

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom