Premium
Habitat heterogeneity captured by 30‐m resolution satellite image texture predicts bird richness across the United States
Author(s) -
Farwell Laura S.,
Elsen Paul R.,
Razenkova Elena,
Pidgeon Anna M.,
Radeloff Volker C.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
ecological applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.864
H-Index - 213
eISSN - 1939-5582
pISSN - 1051-0761
DOI - 10.1002/eap.2157
Subject(s) - species richness , breeding bird survey , spatial heterogeneity , ecology , habitat , vegetation (pathology) , enhanced vegetation index , grassland , geography , biodiversity , land cover , environmental science , remote sensing , climate change , normalized difference vegetation index , land use , biology , vegetation index , medicine , pathology
Abstract Species loss is occurring globally at unprecedented rates, and effective conservation planning requires an understanding of landscape characteristics that determine biodiversity patterns. Habitat heterogeneity is an important determinant of species diversity, but is difficult to measure across large areas using field‐based methods that are costly and logistically challenging. Satellite image texture analysis offers a cost‐effective alternative for quantifying habitat heterogeneity across broad spatial scales. We tested the ability of texture measures derived from 30‐m resolution Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) data to capture habitat heterogeneity and predict bird species richness across the conterminous United States. We used Landsat 8 satellite imagery from 2013–2017 to derive a suite of texture measures characterizing vegetation heterogeneity. Individual texture measures explained up to 21% of the variance in bird richness patterns in North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) data during the same time period. Texture measures were positively related to total breeding bird richness, but this relationship varied among forest, grassland, and shrubland habitat specialists. Multiple texture measures combined with mean EVI explained up to 41% of the variance in total bird richness, and models including EVI‐based texture measures explained up to 10% more variance than those that included only EVI. Models that also incorporated topographic and land cover metrics further improved predictive performance, explaining up to 51% of the variance in total bird richness. A texture measure contributed predictive power and characterized landscape features that EVI and forest cover alone could not, even though the latter two were overall more important variables. Our results highlight the potential of texture measures for mapping habitat heterogeneity and species richness patterns across broad spatial extents, especially when used in conjunction with vegetation indices or land cover data. By generating 30‐m resolution texture maps and modeling bird richness at a near‐continental scale, we expand on previous applications of image texture measures for modeling biodiversity that were either limited in spatial extent or based on coarse‐resolution imagery. Incorporating texture measures into broad‐scale biodiversity models may advance our understanding of mechanisms underlying species richness patterns and improve predictions of species responses to rapid global change.