Premium
Nonnative fish stocking alters stream ecosystem nutrient dynamics
Author(s) -
Alexiades Alexander V.,
Flecker Alexander S.,
Kraft Clifford E.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
ecological applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.864
H-Index - 213
eISSN - 1939-5582
pISSN - 1051-0761
DOI - 10.1002/eap.1498
Subject(s) - nutrient , stocking , brown trout , trout , biomass (ecology) , biology , phosphorus , environmental science , salmo , fishery , ecology , fish <actinopterygii> , chemistry , organic chemistry
Each year, millions of hatchery‐raised fish are stocked into streams and rivers worldwide, yet the effects of hatchery‐raised fish on stream nutrient cycles have seldom been examined. We quantified the influence of supplemental nonnative fish stocking, a widespread recreational fishery management practice, on in‐stream nutrient storage and cycling. We predicted that supplemental, hatchery‐raised brown trout ( Salmo trutta ) stocking would result in increased N and P supply relative to in‐stream biotic demand for those nutrients and that stocked fishes would remineralize and store a significantly greater amount of N and P than the native fish community, due to higher areal biomass. To test these predictions, we measured the biomass, nutrient ( NH 4 + ‐N and soluble reactive phosphorus [SRP]) remineralization rates, and body carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus content of the native fish community and trout stocked into four study streams. We then estimated fish growth rates to determine species‐specific nutrient sequestration rates in body tissues for both stocked and native fish and measured ammonium and phosphorus uptake rates to determine the relative influence of net fish nutrient remineralization on stream nutrient cycles. When brown trout were stocked in these systems at density levels that were orders of magnitude higher than ambient native fish density, they provided a sizeable source of NH 4 + ‐N that could account for up to 85% of demand for that nutrient. Stocked trout had minimal effects on in‐stream SRP cycles even at high release densities, likely due to low per capita SRP excretion rates. A unique feature of our study was that we evaluated the temporal component of the stocked trout nutrient subsidy by estimating the number of fish removed from the system through natural mortality and angler harvest, which indicated that the stocked trout subsidy lasted approximately 6–8 weeks after stocking. By combining population models with areal nutrient excretion rates and estimates of biotic nutrient uptake, we showed that trout stocking provided a strong pulsed nutrient subsidy.