Premium
The representation and processing of familiar faces in dyslexia: differences in age of acquisition effects
Author(s) -
SmithSpark James H.,
Moore Viv
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
dyslexia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.694
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1099-0909
pISSN - 1076-9242
DOI - 10.1002/dys.365
Subject(s) - dyslexia , psychology , automaticity , cognitive psychology , cognition , optimal distinctiveness theory , developmental psychology , developmental dyslexia , reading (process) , linguistics , social psychology , neuroscience , philosophy
Two under‐explored areas of developmental dyslexia research, face naming and age of acquisition (AoA), were investigated. Eighteen dyslexic and 18 non‐dyslexic university students named the faces of 50 well‐known celebrities, matched for facial distinctiveness and familiarity. Twenty‐five of the famous people were learned early in life, while the remaining 25 were first encountered more recently. There was no overall difference between the dyslexics and the non‐dyslexics in the speed or the accuracy with which they named faces, suggesting that face naming is unimpaired in dyslexic adults. In keeping with previous findings, the results indicated a speed and accuracy advantage for early‐acquired over late‐acquired faces. In addition, a significant participant group × AoA interaction demonstrated that the non‐dyslexic group was significantly faster to name early‐ than late‐acquired faces, while the dyslexic group showed a much smaller and non‐significant effect of AoA. The results suggest that there are differences in representation in dyslexia and that these may be linked to problems with attentional/executive function and automaticity. It is proposed that a more fine‐grained approach to investigating dyslexia in adulthood should be adopted, in order to uncover cognitive as well as behavioural differences between dyslexics and non‐dyslexics. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.