Premium
Enantiomeric separation and quantification of R/S‐amphetamine in serum using semi‐automated liquid‐liquid extraction and ultra‐high performance supercritical fluid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry
Author(s) -
Havnen Hilde,
Hansen Miriam,
Spigset Olav,
Hegstad Solfrid
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
drug testing and analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.065
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1942-7611
pISSN - 1942-7603
DOI - 10.1002/dta.2879
Subject(s) - chromatography , chemistry , enantiomer , electrospray ionization , mass spectrometry , analyte , supercritical fluid chromatography , ephedrine , tandem mass spectrometry , liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry , high performance liquid chromatography , organic chemistry , neuroscience , biology
The amphetamine molecule contains a chiral center and its enantiomers exhibit differences in pharmacological effects, with the S‐enantiomer mediating most of the central nervous system stimulating activity. The majority of prescribed amphetamine consists of the pure S‐enantiomer, but therapeutic formulations containing the R‐enantiomer in various proportions are also available. Illegal amphetamine remains available mainly as a racemic mixture of the R‐ and S‐enantiomers. To distinguish between legal and illegal consumption of amphetamine a method for enantiomeric separation and quantification of R/S‐amphetamine in serum was developed and validated using ultra‐high performance supercritical fluid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (UHPSFC‐MS/MS). Sample preparation prior to UHPSFC‐MS/MS analysis was performed by a semi‐automated liquid–liquid extraction method. The UHPSFC‐MS/MS method used a Chiralpak AD‐3 column with a mobile phase consisting of CO 2 and 0.1% ammonium hydroxide in 2‐propanol/methanol (50/50, v/v). The injection volume was 2 μL and run time was 4 minutes. MS/MS detection was performed with positive electrospray ionization and two multiple reaction monitoring transitions ( m/z 136.1 > 119.0 and m/z 136.1 > 91.0). The calibration range was 12.5–1,000 nM for each analyte. The between‐assay relative standard deviations were in the range of 1.3–3.0%. Recovery was 73% and matrix effects ranged from 95 to 100% when corrected with internal standard. After development and validation, the method has been successfully implemented in our laboratory for both separation and quantification of R/S‐amphetamine and has proved to be a reliable and useful tool for distinguishing intake of R‐ and S‐amphetamine in authentic patient samples.