Premium
Syntheses and analytical characterizations of novel (2‐aminopropyl)benzo[ b ]thiophene (APBT) based stimulants
Author(s) -
Brandt Simon D.,
Carlino Laura,
Kavanagh Pierce V.,
Westphal Folker,
Dreiseitel Wolfgang,
Dowling Geraldine,
Baumann Michael H.,
Sitte Harald H.,
Halberstadt Adam L.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
drug testing and analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.065
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1942-7611
pISSN - 1942-7603
DOI - 10.1002/dta.2813
Subject(s) - chemistry , derivatization , thiophene , acetic anhydride , mass spectrometry , benzofuran , benzothiophene , designer drug , infrared spectroscopy , gas chromatography , nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , chromatography , organic chemistry , drug , psychology , psychiatry , catalysis
Two groups of amphetamine‐like drugs with psychostimulant properties that were first developed during the course of scientific studies and later emerged as new psychoactive substances (NPS) are based on the (2‐aminopropyl)indole (API) and (2‐aminopropyl)benzofuran (APB) structural scaffolds. However, sulfur‐based analogs with a benzo[ b ]thiophene structure (resulting in (2‐aminopropyl)benzo[ b ]thiophene (APBT) derivatives) have received little attention. In the present investigation, all six racemic APBT positional isomers were synthesized in an effort to understand their structure–activity relationships relative to API‐ and APB‐based drugs. One lesson learned from the NPS phenomenon is that one cannot exclude the appearance of such substances on the market. Therefore, an in‐depth analytical characterization was performed, including various single‐ and tandem mass spectrometry (MS) and ionization platforms coupled to gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), and solid phase and GC condensed phase infrared spectroscopy (GC‐sIR). Various derivatizations have also been explored; it was found that all six APBT isomers could be differentiated during GC analysis after derivatization with heptafluorobutyric anhydride and ethyl chloroformate (or heptafluorobutyric anhydride and acetic anhydride) under non‐routine conditions. Discriminating analytical features can also be derived from NMR, GC‐EI/CI‐ single‐ and tandem mass spectrometry, LC (pentafluorophenyl stationary phase), and various infrared spectroscopy approaches (including GC‐sIR). Availability of detailed analytical data obtained from these novel APBT‐type stimulants may be useful to researchers and scientists in cases where forensic and clinical investigations are warranted.