Premium
Drug–drug interaction and doping: Effect of non‐prohibited drugs on the urinary excretion profile of methandienone
Author(s) -
Mazzarino Monica,
KhevenhüllerMetsch Franziska L.,
Fiacco Ilaria,
Parr Maria Kristina,
Torre Xavier,
Botrè Francesco
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
drug testing and analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.065
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1942-7611
pISSN - 1942-7603
DOI - 10.1002/dta.2406
Subject(s) - ketoconazole , pharmacology , chemistry , glucuronidation , metabolite , miconazole , in vivo , drug , cyp3a4 , cytochrome p450 , phospholipidosis , microsome , in vitro , biochemistry , metabolism , medicine , biology , antifungal , phospholipid , microbiology and biotechnology , dermatology , membrane
Abstract The potential consequences of drug–drug interactions on the excretion profile of the anabolic androgenic steroid methandienone (17β‐hydroxy‐17α‐methylandrosta‐1,4‐dien‐3‐one) are discussed. More specifically, we have evaluated by in vitro and in vivo experiments the effects of 7 non‐prohibited drugs (fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole, miconazole, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and nefazodone) on the main metabolic pathways of methandienone. These are selected among those most commonly used by the athletes. The in vitro assays were based on the use of human liver microsomes, specific recombinant enzyme isoforms of cytochrome P450 and uridine 5′‐diphospho‐glucuronosyl‐transferase. The in vivo study was performed by analyzing urines collected after the oral administration of methandienone with and without the co‐administration of ketoconazole. Methandienone and its metabolites were determined by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry–based techniques after sample pretreatment including an enzymatic hydrolysis step (performed only for the investigation on phase II metabolism) and liquid/liquid extraction with t ‐butyl methyl‐ether. The results from the in vitro experiments showed that the formation of the hydroxylated and dehydrogenated metabolites was significantly reduced in the presence of itraconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole and nefazodone, whereas the production of the 18‐nor‐hydroxylated metabolites and glucuronidation reactions was reduced significantly only in the presence of ketoconazole and miconazole. The analysis of the post‐administration samples confirmed the in vitro observations, validating the hypothesis that drug–drug interaction may cause significant alterations in the metabolic profile of banned drugs, making their detection during doping control tests more challenging.