Premium
Development of an LC‐MS/MS analytical method for the simultaneous measurement of aldehydes from polyunsaturated fatty acids degradation in animal feed
Author(s) -
Douny Caroline,
Bayram Pinar,
Brose François,
Degand Guy,
Scippo MarieLouise
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
drug testing and analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.065
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1942-7611
pISSN - 1942-7603
DOI - 10.1002/dta.2013
Subject(s) - hexanal , crotonaldehyde , chemistry , chromatography , heptanal , mass spectrometry , malondialdehyde , detection limit , repeatability , polyunsaturated fatty acid , benzaldehyde , nonanal , biochemistry , fatty acid , aldehyde , antioxidant , catalysis
Knowing that polyunsaturated fatty acids can lead to the formation of potentially toxic aldehydes as secondary oxidation products, an analytical method using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS) detection was developed to measure the concentration of eight aldehydes in animal feed: malondialdehyde (MDA), 4‐hydroxy‐2‐nonenal (4‐HNE), 4‐hydroxy‐2‐hexenal (4‐HHE), crotonaldehyde (CRT), benzaldehyde (BNZ), hexanal (HXL), 2,4‐nonadienal, and 2,4‐decadienal. The developed method was validated according to the criteria and procedure described in international standards. The evaluated parameters were specificity/selectivity, recovery, precision, accuracy, uncertainty, limits of detection and quantification, using the concept of accuracy profiles. These parameters were determined during experiments conducted over three different days with ground Kellogg's® Corn Flakes® cereals as model matrix for animal feed and spiked at different levels of concentration. Malondialdehyde, 4‐HHE, 4‐HNE, crotonaldehyde, benzaldehyde, and hexanal can be analyzed in the same run in animal feed with a very good accuracy, with recovery rates ranging from 86 to 109% for a working range going from 0.16 to 12.50 mg/kg. The analysis of 2,4‐nonadienal and 2,4‐decadienal can also be performed but in a limited range of concentration and with a limited degree of accuracy. Their recovery rates ranged between 54 and 114% and coefficient of variation for the intermediate precision between 11 and 25% for these two compounds. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.