Premium
Systematic analysis of glycerol: colourimetric screening and gas chromatography–mass spectrometric confirmation
Author(s) -
Sardela Vinícius F.,
Scalco Fernanda B.,
Cavalcante Karina M.,
Simoni Ruth E.,
Silva Deyvison R.,
Pereira Henrique Marcelo G.,
Oliveira Maria Lúcia L. Costa,
Aquino Neto Francisco R.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
drug testing and analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.065
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1942-7611
pISSN - 1942-7603
DOI - 10.1002/dta.1823
Subject(s) - glycerol , chemistry , chromatography , mass spectrometry , formic acid , gas chromatography , organic chemistry
Glycerol is a naturally occurring polyol in the human body, essential for several metabolic processes. It is widely used in the food, pharmaceutical, and medical industries and in clinical practice as a plasma volume expander (PVE). Athletes, however, may use glycerol to mask the presence of forbidden substances or to enhance performance, inclusively through hyperhydration achieved by glycerol ingestion with added fluid. These practices are considered doping, and are prohibited by the World Anti‐Doping Agency (WADA). Therefore, glycerol was introduced in the prohibited list. Doping through glycerol ingestion can readily be identified by detection of elevated glycerol concentrations in urine. In this paper, a protocol for the fast detection of glycerol in urine is proposed. It consists of a previous visual colourimetric screening, followed by a quantitative/qualitative confirmation analysis by mass spectrometry. The screening procedure involves a reaction in which polyhydric alcohols are oxidized by periodate to formic acid and formaldehyde, which is detected by the addition of a fuchsin solution. For the subsequent qualitative/quantitative confirmation analysis, a gas chromatography–mass spectrometry based approach with a non‐deuterated internal standard and a drying step of only 10 min is proposed. The linear correlation was demonstrated within WADA´s threshold range. The calculated RSD were 2.1% for within‐day precision and 2.8% for between‐day precision. The uncertainty estimation was calculated, and a value of 2.7% was obtained. The procedure may also be used for the analysis of other polyols in urine, as for example the PVE mannitol. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.