z-logo
Premium
Quantitative assessment of computational models for retinotopic map formation
Author(s) -
Hjorth J J Johannes,
Sterratt David C,
Cutts Catherine S,
Willshaw David J,
Eglen Stephen J
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
developmental neurobiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.716
H-Index - 129
eISSN - 1932-846X
pISSN - 1932-8451
DOI - 10.1002/dneu.22241
Subject(s) - biology , neuroscience , evolutionary biology , cognitive science , psychology
Molecular and activity‐based cues acting together are thought to guide retinal axons to their terminal sites in vertebrate optic tectum or superior colliculus (SC) to form an ordered map of connections. The details of mechanisms involved, and the degree to which they might interact, are still not well understood. We have developed a framework within which existing computational models can be assessed in an unbiased and quantitative manner against a set of experimental data curated from the mouse retinocollicular system. Our framework facilitates comparison between models, testing new models against known phenotypes and simulating new phenotypes in existing models. We have used this framework to assess four representative models that combine Eph/ephrin gradients and/or activity‐based mechanisms and competition. Two of the models were updated from their original form to fit into our framework. The models were tested against five different phenotypes: wild type, Isl2‐EphA3 ki/ki , Isl2‐EphA3 ki/+ , ephrin‐A2,A3,A5 triple knock‐out (TKO), and Math5 −/− ( Atoh7 ). Two models successfully reproduced the extent of the Math5 −/− anteromedial projection, but only one of those could account for the collapse point in Isl2‐EphA3 ki/+ . The models needed a weak anteroposterior gradient in the SC to reproduce the residual order in the ephrin‐A2,A3,A5 TKO phenotype, suggesting either an incomplete knock‐out or the presence of another guidance molecule. Our article demonstrates the importance of testing retinotopic models against as full a range of phenotypes as possible, and we have made available MATLAB software, we wrote to facilitate this process. © 2014 The Authors Developmental Neurobiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 75: 641–666, 2015

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here