z-logo
Premium
Binocular maps in Xenopus tectum: Visual experience and the development of isthmotectal topography
Author(s) -
Udin Susan B.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
developmental neurobiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.716
H-Index - 129
eISSN - 1932-846X
pISSN - 1932-8451
DOI - 10.1002/dneu.20933
Subject(s) - neuroscience , tectum , biology , xenopus , retinotopy , visual system , anatomy , visual field , retina , midbrain , central nervous system , biochemistry , gene
Xenopus frogs have a prominent binocular field that develops as a consequence of the migration of the eyes during the remodeling of the head during and after metamorphosis. In the optic tectum, a topographic representation of the ipsilateral eye develops during this same period. It is relayed indirectly, via the nucleus isthmi. In the early stages of binocular development, the topographic matching of the ipsilateral input to the retinotectal input from the contralateral eye is largely governed by chemical cues, but the ultimate determinant of the ipsilateral map is binocular visual input. Visual input is such a dominant factor that abnormal visual input resulting from unilateral eye rotation can induce isthmotectal axons to alter their trajectories dramatically, even shifting their terminal zones from one pole of the tectum to the other. This plasticity normally is high only during a 3–4‐month critical period of late tadpole‐early juvenile life, but the critical period can be extended indefinitely by dark‐rearing. N‐methyl‐ D ‐aspartate (NMDA) receptors are involved in this process; plasticity can be blocked or promoted by chronic treatment with NMDA antagonists or agonists, respectively. Cholinergic nicotinic receptors on retinotectal axons are likely to play an essential role as well. Modifications in the polysialylation of neural cell adhesion molecule are correlated with the state of plasticity. The circuitry underlying binocular plasticity is not yet fully understood but has proved not to be a simple convergence of ipsilateral and contralateral inputs onto the same targets. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 72: 564–574, 2012

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here