Premium
The effect of the PPARγ ligand rosiglitazone on energy balance regulation
Author(s) -
Joosen Annemiek M. C. P.,
Bakker Arjen H. F.,
Gering Maarten J. A.,
Westerterp Klaas R.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
diabetes/metabolism research and reviews
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.307
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1520-7560
pISSN - 1520-7552
DOI - 10.1002/dmrr.592
Subject(s) - rosiglitazone , medicine , endocrinology , placebo , peroxisome proliferator activated receptor , receptor , chemistry , alternative medicine , pathology
Abstract Background and aim Fat mass generation requires an energy surplus and the activity of the peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ (PPARγ). We investigated if the PPARγ ligand rosiglitazone influences substrate usage, energy expenditure (EE) and energy intake (EI) and, thereby, how PPARγ activity contributes to susceptibility to obesity. Methods Twenty healthy males (20–29 years) were randomly assigned to receive a placebo ( n = 10) or rosiglitazone (8 mg/d) ( n = 10) for seven consecutive days, while staying in a respiration chamber. Food intake was ad libitum . Body composition was determined by underwater weighing (day 1) and deuterium dilution (day 1 and 8). Results Mean (±SE) EI was 15.9 ± 0.9 MJ/d in the placebo group and 18.9 ± 1.2 MJ/d in the rosiglitazone group. Mean EE was 11.3 ± 0.3 MJ/d and 12.5 ± 0.5 MJ/d for the placebo and rosiglitazone groups respectively. This resulted in a cumulative positive energy balance (EB) of 32.3 ± 5.1 MJ for placebo and 44.7 ± 6.9 MJ for rosiglitazone. There were no significant differences in EI, EE, and EB between treatments. Both groups did not adjust their fat oxidation to the increased fat intake, but fat oxidation decreased faster in the rosiglitazone group (significantly lower on days 6 and 7). During treatment with rosiglitazone, significantly more fat storage was seen in overweight subjects while this was not the case in the placebo group. Conclusions Our results suggest a shift in substrate usage during PPARγ stimulation leading to a preference for fat storage, especially in subjects with a higher BMI. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.