z-logo
Premium
Improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of insulin analogues using InsuPatch, a local heating device
Author(s) -
Landau Zohar,
Klonoff David,
Nayberg Irina,
Feldman Dmitry,
Levit Shmuel Boris,
Lender Dan,
Mosenzon Ofri,
Raz Itamar,
Wainstein Julio
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
diabetes/metabolism research and reviews
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.307
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1520-7560
pISSN - 1520-7552
DOI - 10.1002/dmrr.2536
Subject(s) - insulin , bolus (digestion) , crossover study , medicine , pharmacodynamics , area under the curve , pharmacokinetics , endocrinology , diabetes mellitus , placebo , alternative medicine , pathology
Background Previous studies have shown that heating the insulin injection site may accelerate insulin absorption. We investigated the pharmacological profile of insulin administered with InsuPatch, a local skin‐heating device. Methods In this randomized, crossover study carried out in 56 subjects with type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump [mean age 32 ± 13.5 years; 23 women; HbA 1c :7.8 ± 0.9% (62 ± 10 mmol/mol) (mean+/−standard deviation)]. Euglycemic glucose clamps were performed after administration of 0.15 units/kg of short‐acting insulin analogues. Each subject underwent three clamp procedures: two with the InsuPatch device (day 1 and day 3) and one without the device (day 1 control). The primary endpoints were the following: (1) the change in the area under the curve (AUC) of insulin during the first 60 min post‐insulin bolus on day 1 with the InsuPatch device versus day 1 control and (2) parameters to assess the safety of using the device. Results The area under the curve of insulin during the initial 60 min (insulin AUC 0–60 ) after insulin bolus was increased by 29.7 ± 7% on day 1 InsuPatch versus day 1 control ( p  < 0.01). Maximal post‐insulin bolus concentration was 57 mU/L on day 1 InsuPatch versus 47.6 mU/L on day 1 control ( p  < 0.01). On day 3 InsuPatch, insulin AUC 0–60 was increased by 27.9 ± 72% versus day 1 InsuPatch ( p  < 0.01). Maximal insulin concentration was 70.4 mU/L versus 57 mU/L, respectively ( p  = 0.05). Conclusions The use of the heating device upon administration of short‐acting insulin analogues in pump‐treated type 1 diabetic patients was found to enhance insulin absorption. This heating device may therefore serve to achieve better meal insulin coverage. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom