z-logo
Premium
Continuities in infant memory development
Author(s) -
Hill Wendy L.,
Borovsky Dianne,
RoveeCollier Carolyn
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
developmental psychobiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.055
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1098-2302
pISSN - 0012-1630
DOI - 10.1002/dev.420210104
Subject(s) - forgetting , psychology , stimulus (psychology) , developmental psychology , conditioning , memory development , cognitive psychology , neuroscience , cognition , cognitive development , statistics , mathematics
Fifty‐five 6‐ to 7‐month‐old human infants were trained in an operant conditioning procedure, adapted from a procedure developed for 3‐month‐old, in which kicks were reinforced by conjugate movement of a mobile. Retention was assessed in a simple forgetting paradigm (Expt. 1) or in a reactivation paradigm (Expt. 2) with either the training mobile or a different one serving as the retrieval cue. In Experiment 1, retention was tested 1, 7, 14, or 21 days after training. When the training and test mobiles were the same, infants exhibited virtually no forgetting for 14 days, but forgetting was complete by 21. When the training and test mobiles were different, infants exhibited no retention, discriminating the novel mobile for as long as they could remember the contingency. In Experiment 2, when the training mobile was presented as a reminder, the forgetting previously seen after 21 days was alleviated; when a different mobile was the reminder, it was not. These findings reveal that the efficacy of a reminder is predicted by the efficacy of that same stimulus in cuing the original memory 24 hr following training. Although the 6‐month‐olds learned more rapidly and remembered longer than infants half their age, their memory processing was described by the same basic principles.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here