z-logo
Premium
Impulsive rats are less maternal
Author(s) -
Lovic Vedran,
Palombo Daniela J.,
Fleming Alison S.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
developmental psychobiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.055
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1098-2302
pISSN - 0012-1630
DOI - 10.1002/dev.20481
Subject(s) - licking , impulsivity , psychology , stimulation , maternal deprivation , developmental psychology , medicine , endocrinology , neuroscience
Early life environment and maternal care can have long‐lasting effects on behavior and physiology. Previously, we found that compared to mother‐reared (MR) female rats, rats reared without mothers, siblings, and nest, through artificially rearing (AR), show reduced levels of maternal behavior when they grow up. These effects can be reversed if AR pups are provided with extra “licking‐like” tactile stimulation during the preweaning period [Gonzalez et al. [2001] Developmental Psychobiology, 38(1), 11–42]. We also found that AR rats are more action impulsive and have reduced attentional capacities in comparison to their MR siblings [Lovic, Fletcher, & Fleming, in preparation; Lovic & Fleming [2004] Behavioural Brain Research 148: 209–219]. However, it is unknown whether increased impulsivity contributes to reduced levels of maternal behaviors. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between impulsivity and maternal behavior in AR and MR rats. Female rats were reared with (MR) or without mothers (AR) and half of the AR rats received additional stroking stimulation. As adults, AR and MR rats were mated and maternal behavior towards their own pups was assessed. In addition, rats were assessed on impulsive action (differential reinforcement of low‐rate schedule; DRL‐20s). Consistent with previous findings, AR rats were both less maternal and more action impulsive than MR rats. Partial correlations revealed that impulsivity was inversely related to pup licking‐impulsive rats were less maternal. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 53: 13–22, 2011.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here