Premium
Mere odor exposure learning in the rat neonate immediately after birth and 1 day later
Author(s) -
Miller Stacie S.,
Spear Norman E.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
developmental psychobiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.055
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1098-2302
pISSN - 0012-1630
DOI - 10.1002/dev.20456
Subject(s) - odor , psychology , colostrum , licking , physiology , weaning , zoology , developmental psychology , medicine , biology , neuroscience , antibody , immunology
Rat pups are more resistant to retroactive associative interference 3 hr after birth than 24 hr later [Cheslock et al. [2004] Developmental Science, 7, 581–598]. The present experiments tested the effect of age, retention interval and dam presence during the retention interval on odor‐induced motor activity subsequent to mere odor exposure. Rats were exposed to an hour of odor immediately after birth or approximately 1 day later and tested after a given retention interval (3 or 27 hr [Exp 1]; 0, 30, 75, or 180 min [Exp. 2]). They spent the retention interval either in the presence or absence of a foster dam (Exp. 1 and 3). After the retention interval, pups were tested in a 4‐min activity test including a 2‐min baseline period and 2 min of odor exposure. Overall activity was scored during tape‐playback. Odor‐exposed pups were more active than nonexposed pups during reexposure to the odor during testing, but this was true only for P0 pups. In contrast, P1 pups without prior odor exposure were active during testing and behaviorally quieted in the presence of the odor they were previously exposed to. Though 1 day apart, newborn rats just hours old lack many of the experiences that a 1‐day‐old has had including nursing, huddling, and being groomed. These experiences are associated with, among other stimuli, a barrage of olfactory cues (e.g., colostrum, saliva, dander, feces, and urine). P0 and P1 pups also differ in their proximity from the birthing experience and associated neurochemical changes. The age‐related pattern of responding to odors based on previous odor exposure was discussed in relation to these and other possibilities. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 52: 343–351, 2010.