Premium
A history of iron deficiency anemia during infancy alters brain monoamine activity later in juvenile monkeys
Author(s) -
Coe Christopher L.,
Lubach Gabriele R.,
Bianco Laura,
Beard John L.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
developmental psychobiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.055
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1098-2302
pISSN - 0012-1630
DOI - 10.1002/dev.20365
Subject(s) - monoamine neurotransmitter , weaning , dopamine , physiology , juvenile , anemia , cerebrospinal fluid , iron deficiency , psychology , medicine , endocrinology , biology , serotonin , receptor , genetics
Both during and after a period of iron deficiency (ID), iron‐dependent neural processes are affected, which raises the potential concern that the anemia commonly experienced by many growing infants could have a protracted effect on the developing brain. To further investigate the effects of ID on the immature brain, 49 infant rhesus monkeys were evaluated across the first year of life. The mothers, and subsequently the infants after weaning, were maintained on a standardized diet containing 180 mg/kg of iron and were not provided other iron‐rich foods as treats or supplements. As the infants grew, they were all screened with hematological tests, which documented that 16 (33.3%) became markedly ID between 4 and 8 months of age. During this anemic period and subsequently at 1 year of age, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens were collected to compare monoamine activity in the ID and iron‐sufficient infants. Monoamine neurotransmitters and metabolite levels were normal at 4 and 8 months of age, but by 1 year the formerly anemic monkeys had significantly lower dopamine and significantly higher norepinephrine levels. These findings indicate that ID can affect the developmental trajectory of these two important neurotransmitter systems, which are associated with emotionality and behavioral performance, and further that the impact in the young monkey was most evident during the period of recovery. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 51: 301–309, 2009