z-logo
Premium
Does infant memory expression reflect age at encoding or age at retrieval?
Author(s) -
Hartshorn Kristin,
RoveeCollier Carolyn
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
developmental psychobiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.055
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1098-2302
pISSN - 0012-1630
DOI - 10.1002/dev.10101
Subject(s) - context (archaeology) , encoding (memory) , psychology , developmental psychology , human memory , context dependent memory , cognitive psychology , neuroscience , cognition , biology , recall , free recall , paleontology
Do human infants express a memory acquired earlier in ontogeny in a manner appropriate to their age at encoding or their age at the time of retrieval? To answer this, we exploited the fact that retention is highly context dependent at 6 months but not at 8–9 months of age. Six‐month‐olds learned an operant response in one context, and their memory was maintained by monthly reinstatements in the original context. At 8 or 9 months of age, 1 month after the last (or only) reinstatement, infants were tested in either the same or a different context. During testing, infants' retention was no longer context dependent; rather, they responded robustly in both test contexts. These results revealed that infants expressed a memory acquired when they were younger in a manner appropriate to their test age. They were interpreted in terms of changes in the functional significance of context before and after infants self‐locomote. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 42: 283–291, 2003.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom