z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Self‐constraining of low‐energy rivers explains low channel mobility and tortuous planforms
Author(s) -
Candel Jasper H. J.,
Makaske Bart,
Kijm Niels,
Kleinhans Maarten G.,
Storms Joep E. A.,
Wallinga Jakob
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the depositional record
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.604
H-Index - 3
ISSN - 2055-4877
DOI - 10.1002/dep2.112
Subject(s) - tributary , floodplain , bank erosion , geology , alluvium , planform , erosion , channel (broadcasting) , hydrology (agriculture) , bank , geomorphology , physics , mechanics , geography , geotechnical engineering , cartography , engineering , electrical engineering , aerodynamics
Meandering rivers are abundant on Earth, from the largest rivers to the smallest tributaries. The classical view of meandering rivers is a sinuous planform with rounded bends, which grow and migrate until they are cut‐off. However, many low‐energy meandering rivers have planforms that are much more complex than this classical view due to the heterogeneity of their alluvium, and show relatively limited channel migration. Based on a detailed palaeogeographic study of the Dommel River in The Netherlands, it is inferred that low‐energy meandering rivers may develop tortuous planforms with sharp bends, owing to self‐formed deposits that increasingly constrain the channel mobility. This mechanism is corroborated by data from 47 meandering river reaches of varied scale from around the world, which show that erosion‐resistant floodplain deposits are preserved in the river banks when the river energy is below a critical threshold. The term ‘self‐constraining’ is proposed for low‐energy rivers where an increase in bank stability over time results in progressive tortuous planforms and reduced mobility. A conceptual model, based on the dataset, shows that the increase in bank stability over time also increases the energy required to break out of the tendency to self‐constrain. Self‐constraining thereby enhances the resilience of the system to bank erosion, while an unexpected increase in bank erosion may occur if river energy exceeds the critical threshold. This study provides a novel explanation for the evolution of low‐energy river planforms and dynamics, and provides new insights on their responses to climate changes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here