Premium
ACE inhibition versus angiotensin II, AT 1 receptor antagonism: A review of effects on intimal lesion formation in animal models of vascular injury, restenosis, and atherosclerosis
Author(s) -
Prescott Margaret Forney,
Sawyer Wilbur K.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
drug development research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.582
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1098-2299
pISSN - 0272-4391
DOI - 10.1002/ddr.430290204
Subject(s) - lesion , restenosis , medicine , angiotensin ii , angiotensin ii receptor type 1 , losartan , benazepril , antagonist , balloon catheter , angiotensin converting enzyme , vascular smooth muscle , pharmacology , endocrinology , receptor , balloon , pathology , blood pressure , stent , smooth muscle
Abstract We recently demonstrated that the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) benazepril reduced balloon‐induced lesion formation solely by inhibiting smooth muscle cell (SMC) migration, whereas the Ang II, AT1 antagonist losartan reduced lesion formation by inhibiting both SMC migration and proliferation [Prescott et al. (1991): Am J Pathol 139:1291–1296.]. We thus proposed that in order for both SMC migration and proliferation to be reduced by ACEi treatment, a dose must be selected which is greater than the dose necessary to reduce blood pressure. Recent evidence that ACEi prevention of early intimal lesion formation following balloon injury can be reversed by simultaneous administration of the bradykinin antagonist, Hoe 140 [de‐Blois et al. (1992): Circulation 86 [Suppl I]:I‐226.] raises the possibility that low doses of ACEi treatment may be sufficient to inhibit lesion formation via mechanisms independent of effects on Ang II production but that high doses of ACEi treatment are necessary to prevent the local formation of Ang II. The present review therefore analyzes the results of ACEi treatment on lesion formation following balloon catheterization, vascular stenting, or angioplasty. Effects on lesion formation are correlated with the importance of SMC migration vs. proliferation in the specific model employed. In addition, we present evidence to support our speculation that ACEi reduction of both atherosclerosis and restenotic lesions in the hypercholesterolemic rabbit is primarily due to inhibition of monocyte emigration into the vessel wall and is independent of effects on SMC migration or proliferation. Finally, we present preliminary results from our efforts to develop a rabbit angioplasty model in which macrophage‐derived foam cells are not the primary component of either the initial “atherosclerotic” lesion or the restenotic lesion post‐angioplasty. © 1993 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.