Premium
Some behavioral effects of repeated d ‐amphetamine administrations
Author(s) -
Katz Jonathan L.,
Witkin Jeffrey M.,
Dworkin Steven I.,
Dykstra Linda A.,
Carter Richard B.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
drug development research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.582
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1098-2299
pISSN - 0272-4391
DOI - 10.1002/ddr.430200105
Subject(s) - amphetamine , food delivery , psychology , dextroamphetamine , anesthesia , peck (imperial) , zoology , pharmacology , medicine , mathematics , dopamine , neuroscience , biology , marketing , business , geometry
Effects of daily administrations of d ‐amphetamine were studied on key peck responses of pigeons maintained under a multiple fixed‐interval 2‐min, fixed‐ratio 30‐responseschedule. Under the fixed‐interval schedule, a pause was followed by a transition to increasing rates of responding until food presentation. Under the fixed‐ratio schedule, higher sustained rates of responding were maintained. Low to intermediate doses (0.3‐1.0 mg/kg) of d ‐amphetamine changed the temporal patterns and occasionally increased rates of responding under the fixed‐interval schedule. Higher doses decreased rates of responding under bothschedules. With daily injections of 1.0 mg/kg d ‐amphetamine prior to experimental sessions, the effects of this dose on rates and patterns of responding were attenuated, and d ‐anphetamine dose‐effect curves were shifted to the right, primarily under the fixed‐ratio schedule. Similar results were obtained with daily presession injections of 5.6 mg/kg d ‐amphetamine in a second group of pigeons, except that rates of responding under both schedules were decreased by this daily dose, and did not return completely to control values with repeated injections. In a third group of pigeons, 1.0 mg/kg d ‐amphetamine administered daily, after experimental sessions, did not alter dose‐effect functions for d ‐amphetamine. In a second experiment, pigeons were trained to peck one response key when given 1.0 mg/kg d ‐amphetamine and a different key when given presession water injections. Increasing doses of d‐amphetamine produced incresing percentages of d ‐amphetamine‐key responses. Repeated administration of 5.6 mg/kg d‐amphetamine shifted these dose‐effect functions to the right one‐half log unit. Results suggested that decreases in reinforcement frequency are not a necessary condition for the development of behavioral tolerance to d‐amphetamine.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom