z-logo
Premium
Some behavioral effects of repeated d ‐amphetamine administrations
Author(s) -
Katz Jonathan L.,
Witkin Jeffrey M.,
Dworkin Steven I.,
Dykstra Linda A.,
Carter Richard B.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
drug development research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.582
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1098-2299
pISSN - 0272-4391
DOI - 10.1002/ddr.430200105
Subject(s) - amphetamine , food delivery , psychology , dextroamphetamine , anesthesia , peck (imperial) , zoology , pharmacology , medicine , mathematics , dopamine , neuroscience , biology , marketing , business , geometry
Abstract Effects of daily administrations of d ‐amphetamine were studied on key peck responses of pigeons maintained under a multiple fixed‐interval 2‐min, fixed‐ratio 30‐responseschedule. Under the fixed‐interval schedule, a pause was followed by a transition to increasing rates of responding until food presentation. Under the fixed‐ratio schedule, higher sustained rates of responding were maintained. Low to intermediate doses (0.3‐1.0 mg/kg) of d ‐amphetamine changed the temporal patterns and occasionally increased rates of responding under the fixed‐interval schedule. Higher doses decreased rates of responding under bothschedules. With daily injections of 1.0 mg/kg d ‐amphetamine prior to experimental sessions, the effects of this dose on rates and patterns of responding were attenuated, and d ‐anphetamine dose‐effect curves were shifted to the right, primarily under the fixed‐ratio schedule. Similar results were obtained with daily presession injections of 5.6 mg/kg d ‐amphetamine in a second group of pigeons, except that rates of responding under both schedules were decreased by this daily dose, and did not return completely to control values with repeated injections. In a third group of pigeons, 1.0 mg/kg d ‐amphetamine administered daily, after experimental sessions, did not alter dose‐effect functions for d ‐amphetamine. In a second experiment, pigeons were trained to peck one response key when given 1.0 mg/kg d ‐amphetamine and a different key when given presession water injections. Increasing doses of d‐amphetamine produced incresing percentages of d ‐amphetamine‐key responses. Repeated administration of 5.6 mg/kg d‐amphetamine shifted these dose‐effect functions to the right one‐half log unit. Results suggested that decreases in reinforcement frequency are not a necessary condition for the development of behavioral tolerance to d‐amphetamine.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here