Premium
Fibroadenoma of the breast: Diagnostic pitfalls of fine‐needle aspiration
Author(s) -
Benoit Janine L,
Kara Rosemin,
Elizabeth McGregor S.,
Duggan Máire A.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
diagnostic cytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.417
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1097-0339
pISSN - 8755-1039
DOI - 10.1002/dc.2840080623
Subject(s) - fibroadenoma , medicine , malignancy , fine needle aspiration , pathology , cytopathology , biopsy , breast cancer , cytology , cancer
Abstract On fine‐needle aspiration (FNA), fibroadenomas have a characteristic cytological appearance, although occasional cases are misinterpreted as carcinomas and vice versa. In a review of 521 breast aspirates correlated with the subsequent histology, six of 87 fibroadenomas (7%) were malignant or suspicious of malignancy on FNA (false positives). Following cytological review, four were still suspicious of malignancy because of cellular dyscohesion and prominent nucleoli, while two were fibroadenomas. On FNA, four of 145 carcinomas (3%) were diagnosed as fibroadenomas (false negatives). On review, three were malignant or suspicious of malignancy, while one was consistent with a fibroadenoma. Three false negative diagnoses were due to underappreciation of single malignant cells present between epithelial groupings typical of a fibroadenoma, while one was due to undersampling of the carcinoma. Cytologically, some fibroadenomas are sufficiently atypical that histological confirmation is necessary to exclude a malignancy. Misinterpreting carcinomas as fibroadenomas could be avoided by careful study of the morphology of isolated cells.