Premium
An investigation into false‐negative transthoracic fine needle aspiration and core biopsy specimens
Author(s) -
Minot Douglas M.,
Gilman Elizabeth A.,
Aubry MarieChristine,
Voss Jesse S.,
Van Epps Sarah G.,
Tuve Delores J,
Sciallis Andrew P.,
Henry Michael R.,
Salomao Diva R.,
Lee Peter,
Carlson Stephanie K.,
Clayton Amy C.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
diagnostic cytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.417
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1097-0339
pISSN - 8755-1039
DOI - 10.1002/dc.23169
Subject(s) - medicine , malignancy , radiology , biopsy , fine needle aspiration , sampling (signal processing) , carcinoma , medical diagnosis , lung , pathology , filter (signal processing) , computer science , computer vision
Transthoracic fine needle aspiration (TFNA)/core needle biopsy (CNB) under computed tomography (CT) guidance has proved useful in the assessment of pulmonary nodules. We sought to determine the TFNA false‐negative (FN) rate at our institution and identify potential causes of FN diagnoses. Medical records were reviewed from 1,043 consecutive patients who underwent CT‐guided TFNA with or without CNB of lung nodules over a 5‐year time period (2003–2007). Thirty‐seven FN cases of “negative” TFNA/CNB with malignant outcome were identified with 36 cases available for review, of which 35 had a corresponding CNB. Cases were reviewed independently (blinded to original diagnosis) by three pathologists with 15 age‐ and sex‐matched positive and negative controls. Diagnosis (i.e., nondiagnostic, negative or positive for malignancy, atypical or suspicious) and qualitative assessments were recorded. Consensus diagnosis was suspicious or positive in 10 (28%) of 36 TFNA cases and suspicious in 1 (3%) of 35 CNB cases, indicating potential interpretive errors. Of the 11 interpretive errors (including both suspicious and positive cases), 8 were adenocarcinomas, 1 squamous cell carcinoma, 1 metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and 1 lymphoma. The remaining 25 FN cases (69.4%) were considered sampling errors and consisted of 7 adenocarcinomas, 3 nonsmall cell carcinomas, 3 lymphomas, 2 squamous cell carcinomas, and 2 renal cell carcinomas. Interpretive and sampling error cases were more likely to abut the pleura, while histopathologically, they tended to be necrotic and air‐dried. The overall FN rate in this patient cohort is 3.5% (1.1% interpretive and 2.4% sampling errors). Diagn. Cytopathol. 2014;42:1063–1068;. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom