Premium
The effects of antibody clone and pretreatment method on the results of HER2 immunostaining in cytologic samples of metastatic breast cancer: A query and a review of the literature
Author(s) -
Fetsch Patricia A.,
Abati Andrea
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
diagnostic cytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.417
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1097-0339
pISSN - 8755-1039
DOI - 10.1002/dc.20638
Subject(s) - medicine , staining , immunohistochemistry , antibody , immunostaining , pathology , antigenicity , cancer , breast cancer , cytology , metastatic breast cancer , clone (java method) , immunology , biology , dna , genetics
The standardization and use of heat‐induced epitope retrieval (HIER) is particularly important with immunohistochemical markers that direct the course of cancer treatment, such as Herceptin therapy. Increasingly, many laboratories are performing immunohistochemical analysis using various antibodies and methodologies for HER2/neu. We attempted to determine the effects of antibody clone and pretreatment methods on the interpretation of HER‐2/neu staining in cytologic samples. Cell block sections from 54 cases of metastatic breast cancer (24 FNAs, 30 effusions) were analyzed for HER2 expression using antibodies to CB‐11, TAB250, and A0485. Antibodies were analyzed with and without HIER. One pathologist using the FDA‐approved scoring system for the HercepTest reviewed all slides in a blinded fashion. Five of fifty‐four cases (9%) using CB‐11 showed a significant increase in HER2 immunoreactivity using HIER (i.e. from 0/1+ to 2–3+). However, in twenty‐nine of fifty‐four cases (54%), the cytoplasmic background was significantly higher after HIER. With the A0485 antibody, two of fifty four cases (4%) showed a significant increase in immunoreactivity using HIER, while seventeen of fifty‐four cases (31%) exhibited only more pronounced cytoplasmic staining. HIER pretreatment did not increase HER2 staining in any TAB250 stained sample, rather four of fifty‐four cases (7%) showed a significant decrease in staining with HIER. We conclude that HIER may enhance membrane staining with the CB‐11 and A0485 antibodies, but also increases cytoplasmic background. Loss of antigenicity is seen when HIER is used with TAB250. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2007;35:319–328. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.