z-logo
Premium
Usefulness of concurrent Papanicolaou smear at time of cervical biopsy
Author(s) -
Panos John C.,
Jones Bruce A.,
Mazzara Paul F.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
diagnostic cytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.417
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1097-0339
pISSN - 8755-1039
DOI - 10.1002/dc.2053
Subject(s) - medicine , colposcopy , papanicolaou stain , biopsy , predictive value , pap smears , gynecology , obstetrics , radiology , cervical cancer , cancer
Abstract The reliability and cost‐effectiveness of a repeat Papanicolaou (Pap) smear performed at the time of colposcopic biopsy is uncertain. To evaluate the usefulness of this practice, Pap smear and biopsy results of 718 patients were reviewed and compared: 619 patients had Pap smears performed prior to colposcopy with a 1.1% false‐negative rate, 97.5% sensitivity, and 83.6% positive predictive value. Ninety‐nine patients had Pap smears performed at the time of colposcopy with a 19.1% false‐negative rate, 56.8% sensitivity, and 92.6% positive predictive value. Repeat Pap smear at the time of colposcopy resulted in significant changes in the management of only 2 patients (2%) and more careful follow‐up in one (1%). Pap smears performed at colposcopic biopsy are less sensitive than those done prior to biopsy ( P < 0.001). The clinical benefit of this practice is marginal, considering the added costs and potential detrimental effects to the colposcopic examination, provided patients receive adequate follow‐up. Diagn. Cytopathol. 25:270–273, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here