Premium
Concatenation of polar codes with three‐dimensional parity check (3D‐PC) codes to improve error performance over fading channels
Author(s) -
Jasim Ibrahim Beram,
Bayat Oguz,
Ucan Osman N.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international journal of communication systems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.344
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1099-1131
pISSN - 1074-5351
DOI - 10.1002/dac.3970
Subject(s) - concatenation (mathematics) , additive white gaussian noise , polar code , concatenated error correction code , computer science , algorithm , low density parity check code , rician fading , decoding methods , turbo code , fading , telecommunications , mathematics , block code , arithmetic , white noise
Summary In this paper, we concatenated of three‐dimensional parity check (3D‐PC) block and polar codes for improving error correction performance and bit error rate (BER). Three different sizes of 3D parity check blocks (4 × 4 × 4, 8 × 8 × 8, and 16 × 16 × 16) are used for polar code concatenation. The 4 × 4 × 4 block returns the best performance, but higher complexity of decoder is needed unlikely. The 8 × 8 × 8 has returned acceptable complexity and good performacne. The complexity of decoder is less in the case of 16 × 16 × 16 with slight performance. The performance of the 3D‐PC is reduced when the codewords length is increased. The experiment considered the presence of additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) with Rayleigh and Rician fading environments. 3D‐PC and polar code concatenation is more precise with codewords of short length, whereas there is insufficient concatenation accuracy with longer codewords. The outcomes of this study contain comparison between AWGN, Rayleigh, and Rician environments. The AWGN is noticed to have a lesser negative impact on the performance of code. Furthermore, increasing the code length may slightly fill the gap of performance between the concatenated and none concatenated polar codes due to the impact of code length on parity check code performance. Simulation results showed the coding performance in case of the polar code with concatenation and without concatenation for different code lengths. Generally, the 3D‐PC polar code concatenation is drawn the optimal result in AWGN environments.