Premium
DEFICITS IN DISENGAGING ATTENTION FROM THREAT PREDICT IMPROVED RESPONSE TO COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY FOR ANXIETY
Author(s) -
Barry Tom J.,
Sewart Amy R.,
Arch Joanna J.,
Craske Michelle G.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
depression and anxiety
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.634
H-Index - 129
eISSN - 1520-6394
pISSN - 1091-4269
DOI - 10.1002/da.22421
Subject(s) - disengagement theory , anxiety , psychology , vigilance (psychology) , clinical psychology , exposure therapy , cognition , cognitive behavioral therapy , safety behaviors , attentional bias , poison control , psychiatry , injury prevention , medicine , cognitive psychology , gerontology , environmental health
Background Pretreatment biases in attending toward threat have been shown to predict greater symptom reduction following cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety. Findings to date do not extend to clinical severity of diagnoses and they assess treatment response immediately posttreatment and not at follow‐up. Research in this area has also not examined components of vigilance (e.g., engagement, disengagement) or whether these effects are confined to external attention and not attention to internal symptoms of anxiety. Methods In the present investigation, 96 adults with a range of anxiety disorders completed a dot probe task to assess threat‐related attention biases before and after 12 sessions of CBT. Results Pretreatment deficits in disengaging attention from external and internal threats, and not the speed of engagement with threat, predicted reductions in clinical severity of diagnoses that were maintained 2 years later. The presence of posttreatment attention biases was not associated with increased clinical severity after treatment. Conclusions Pretreatment deficits in disengaging attention from threat may promote better and more durable response to CBT for a range anxiety disorders.