z-logo
Premium
GATEKEEPER TRAINING FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION IN FIRST NATIONS COMMUNITY MEMBERS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Author(s) -
Sareen Jitender,
Isaak Corinne,
Bolton ShayLee,
Enns Murray W.,
Elias Brenda,
Deane Frank,
Munro Garry,
Stein Murray B.,
Chateau Dan,
Gould Madelyn,
Katz Laurence Y.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
depression and anxiety
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.634
H-Index - 129
eISSN - 1520-6394
pISSN - 1091-4269
DOI - 10.1002/da.22141
Subject(s) - suicidal ideation , medicine , context (archaeology) , preparedness , randomized controlled trial , suicide prevention , poison control , intervention (counseling) , clinical psychology , psychology , psychiatry , environmental health , paleontology , political science , law , biology
Background Gatekeeper training aims to train people to recognize and identify those who are at risk for suicide and assist them in getting care. A pplied S uicide I ntervention S kills T raining ( ASIST ), a form of gatekeeper training, has been implemented around the world without a controlled evaluation. We hypothesized that participants in 2 days of ASIST gatekeeper training would have increased knowledge and preparedness to help people with suicidal ideation in comparison to participants who received a 2‐day R esilience R etreat that did not focus on suicide awareness and intervention skills (control condition). Methods First N ations on reserve people in N orthwestern M anitoba, aged 16 years and older, were recruited and randomized to two arms of the study. Self‐reported measures were collected at three time points—immediately pre‐, immediately post‐, and 6 months post intervention. The primary outcome was the S uicide I ntervention R esponse I nventory, a validated scale that assesses the capacity for individuals to intervene with suicidal behavior. Secondary outcomes included self‐reported preparedness measures and gatekeeper behaviors . Results In comparison with the R esilience R etreat (n = 24), ASIST training (n = 31) was not associated with a significant impact on all outcomes of the study based on intention‐to‐treat analysis. There was a trend toward an increase in suicidal ideation among those who participated in the ASIST in comparison to those who were in the R esilience R etreat . Conclusions The lack of efficacy of ASIST in a F irst N ations on‐reserve sample is concerning in the context of widespread policies in C anada on the use of gatekeeper training in suicide prevention .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom