Premium
LONG‐TERM EFFICACY OF REPEATED DAILY PREFRONTAL TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION (TMS) IN TREATMNT‐RESISTANT DEPRESSION
Author(s) -
Mantovani Antonio,
Pavlicova Martina,
Avery David,
Nahas Ziad,
McDonald William M.,
Wajdik Chandra D.,
Holtzheimer Paul E.,
George Mark S.,
Sackeim Harold A.,
Lisanby Sarah H.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
depression and anxiety
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.634
H-Index - 129
eISSN - 1520-6394
pISSN - 1091-4269
DOI - 10.1002/da.21967
Subject(s) - transcranial magnetic stimulation , depression (economics) , psychology , antidepressant , treatment resistant depression , rating scale , open label , medicine , major depressive episode , randomized controlled trial , anesthesia , psychiatry , stimulation , mood , anxiety , developmental psychology , economics , macroeconomics
Background A few studies have examined the durability of transcranial magnetic stimulation ( TMS ) antidepressant benefit once patients remitted. This study examined the long‐term durability of clinical benefit from TMS using a protocol‐specified TMS taper and either continuation pharmacotherapy or naturalistic follow‐up. Methods Patients were remitters from an acute double‐blind sham‐controlled trial of TMS (n = 18), or from an open‐label extension in patients who did not respond to the acute trial (n = 43). Long‐term durability of TMS acute effect was examined in remitters over a 12‐week follow‐up. Relapse, defined as 24‐item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS‐24) ≥20, was the primary outcome . Results Of 61 remitters in the acute trial, five entered naturalistic follow‐up and 50 entered the TMS taper. Thirty‐two patients completed TMS taper and 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐month follow‐up. At 3‐month visit, 29 of 50 (58%) were classified as in remission ( HDRS ‐24 ≤10), two of 50 (4%) as partial responders (30%≤ HDRS ‐24 reduction <50% from baseline), and one of 50 (2%) met criteria for relapse. During the entire 3‐month follow‐up, five of the 37 patients relapsed (relapse rate = 13.5%), but four of them regained remission by the end of the study. The average time to relapse in these five patients was 7.2 ± 3.3 weeks. Patients who relapsed had higher depression scores at 1 month . Conclusions While one third of the sample was lost to follow‐up, our results demonstrate that most patients contributing to observations experienced persistence of benefit from TMS followed by pharmacotherapy or no medication. Longer follow‐up and more rigorous studies are needed to explore the true long‐term durability of remission produced by TMS .