Premium
Determination of optimal replicate number for validation of imprecision using fluorescence cell‐based assays: Proposed practical method
Author(s) -
Davis Bruce H.,
McLaren Christine E.,
Carcio Anthony J.,
Wong Linda,
Hedley Benjamin D.,
Keeney Mike,
Curtis Adam,
Culp Naomi B.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
cytometry part b: clinical cytometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.646
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1552-4957
pISSN - 1552-4949
DOI - 10.1002/cyto.b.21116
Subject(s) - replicate , repeatability , enumeration , coefficient of variation , analyte , biology , computational biology , chromatography , statistics , mathematics , chemistry , combinatorics
Background Assay validation includes determination of inherent imprecision across the reportable range. However, specific practical guidelines for determinations of precision for cell‐based fluorescence assays performed on flow cytometers are currently lacking. Methods Replicates of 10 or 20 measurements were obtained for flow cytometric assays developed for clinical in vitro diagnostic use, including neutrophil CD64 expression for infection/sepsis detection, fetal red cell enumeration for fetomaternal hemorrhage detection, human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 quantitation in leukocytes for possible correlation with drug responsiveness, and CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell enumeration of apheresis products, using up to three different instrument platforms for each assay. For each assay, the mean, 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (CV) of sequential replicates were determined. Results For all assays and most instrument platforms, <5 replicates were found adequate to validate assay imprecision levels below the 5–10% CV for repeatability claimed by the manufacturers of these assays. Results plotted as a novel parameter derived from the 95% CI and the cumulative mean for replicates, termed variance factor (VF), provide a data‐driven means for determining optimal replicate numbers. Conclusions The novel VF can provide information to guide the practical selection of optimal replicate numbers for validation of imprecision in flow cytometric assays. The optimal number of replicates was assay and instrument platform dependent. Our findings indicate that three to four replicates are sufficient for most flow cytometric assays and instrument combinations, rather than the higher numbers suggested by CLSI guidelines for soluble analytes. © 2013 International Clinical Cytometry Society