Premium
Bradykinin‐induced inhibition of proliferation rate during neurosphere differentiation: Consequence or cause of neuronal enrichment?
Author(s) -
Pillat Micheli M.,
Cheffer Arquimedes,
de Andrade Cinthia M.,
Morsch Vera M.,
Schetinger Maria R. C.,
Ulrich Henning
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
cytometry part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.316
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1552-4930
pISSN - 1552-4922
DOI - 10.1002/cyto.a.22705
Subject(s) - bradykinin , neurosphere , neurogenesis , microbiology and biotechnology , neuroscience , biology , chemistry , cellular differentiation , biochemistry , gene , receptor , adult stem cell
Neural stem cells proliferate and differentiate into neurons and glial cells, being responsible for embryonic and postnatal development of the central nervous system (CNS) as well as for regeneration in the adult brain. These cells also play a key role in maintaining the physiological integrity of the CNS in face of injury or disease. The previous study has demonstrated that bradykinin (BK) treatment simultaneously induces neuronal enrichment (indicating that BK contributes to neurogenesis) and reduced proliferation rates during in vitro differentiation of rat embryonic telencephalon neural precursor cells (NPCs). Here, we provide a mechanism for the unresolved question whether (i) the low rate of proliferation is owed to enhanced neurogenesis or, conversely, (ii) the alteration of the population ratio could result from low proliferation of NPCs and glial cells. In agreement with the previous study, BK promoted neuron‐specific β3‐tubulin and MAP2 expression in differentiating embryonic mouse neurospheres, whereas glial protein expression and global proliferation rates decreased. Furthermore, BK augmented the global frequency of cells in G 0 ‐phase of cell cycle after differentiation. Heterogeneous cell populations were observed at this stage, including neurons that always remaining a quiescent state (G 0 ‐phase). It is noteworthy that BK did not interfere with proliferation of any particular cell type, evidenced by coimmunostaining for nestin, β3‐tubulin, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and 5‐ethynyl‐2′‐deoxyuridine (EdU). Thus, we conclude that neuronal enrichment is owing only to the fostering of neurogenesis, and that the low proliferation rate on the seventh day of differentiation is a consequence and not the cause of BK‐induced neuronal enrichment. © 2015 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry