Premium
Just compensation?
Author(s) -
Rajwa Bartek
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
cytometry part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.316
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1552-4930
pISSN - 1552-4922
DOI - 10.1002/cyto.a.21118
Subject(s) - detector , cytometry , signal (programming language) , nonlinear system , compensation (psychology) , computer science , flow cytometry , mathematics , physics , medicine , telecommunications , psychology , quantum mechanics , psychoanalysis , immunology , programming language
IN their recent article entitled ‘‘Improved compensation in flow cytometry by multivariable optimization,’’ Sug ar et al. (1) made the claim that introduction of double-stained controls improves the quality of the compensation process in flow cytometry. However, it seems that the conclusions presented by the authors may be well based on a logical fallacy. As demonstrated by Bagwell and Adams (2) and Roederer (3), cytometry compensation is in fact a special case of linear spectral unmixing. As such, the phenomenon known in cytometry as ‘‘spectral spillover’’ may be modeled using a basic linear spectral mixture equation. For every single measured cell
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom