z-logo
Premium
Quantifying colocalization by correlation: The Pearson correlation coefficient is superior to the Mander's overlap coefficient
Author(s) -
Adler Jeremy,
Parmryd Ingela
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
cytometry part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.316
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1552-4930
pISSN - 1552-4922
DOI - 10.1002/cyto.a.20896
Subject(s) - correlation coefficient , pearson product moment correlation coefficient , uncorrelated , correlation , colocalization , statistics , offset (computer science) , population , pixel , mathematics , optics , physics , computer science , biology , medicine , geometry , environmental health , programming language , microbiology and biotechnology
The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and the Mander's overlap coefficient (MOC) are used to quantify the degree of colocalization between fluorophores. The MOC was introduced to overcome perceived problems with the PCC. The two coefficients are mathematically similar, differing in the use of either the absolute intensities (MOC) or of the deviation from the mean (PCC). A range of correlated datasets, which extend to the limits of the PCC, only evoked a limited response from the MOC. The PCC is unaffected by changes to the offset while the MOC increases when the offset is positive. Both coefficients are independent of gain. The MOC is a confusing hybrid measurement, that combines correlation with a heavily weighted form of co‐occurrence, favors high intensity combinations, downplays combinations in which either or both intensities are low and ignores blank pixels. The PCC only measures correlation. A surprising finding was that the addition of a second uncorrelated population can substantially increase the measured correlation, demonstrating the importance of excluding background pixels. Overall, since the MOC is unresponsive to substantial changes in the data and is hard to interpret, it is neither an alternative to nor a useful substitute for the PCC. The MOC is not suitable for making measurements of colocalization either by correlation or co‐occurrence. © 2010 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here