Open Access
Model system evaluating fluorescein‐labeled microbeads as internal standards to calibrate fluorescence intensity on flow cytometers
Author(s) -
Vogt Robert F.,
Cross G. David,
Henderson L. Omar,
Phillips Donald L.
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
cytometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1097-0320
pISSN - 0196-4763
DOI - 10.1002/cyto.990100308
Subject(s) - fluorescence , calibration , fluorescein , calibration curve , microbead (research) , intensity (physics) , chemistry , chromatography , analytical chemistry (journal) , materials science , biomedical engineering , biological system , detection limit , mathematics , optics , biology , physics , statistics , biochemistry , medicine
Abstract Fluorescence intensity calibration was evaluated in a model system for flow cytometers using commercially available fluorescein‐labeled microbeads as internal standards and stabilized fluoresceinated thymus cell nuclei (Fluorotrol) as surrogates for stained mononuclear cells. Spectrophotometrically determined calibration values for the microbeads were used to generate a standard curve that converted green fluorescence histogram channels into molecular equivalents of soluble fluorescein (MESF). In 19 analyses repeated during a single run, the coefficients of variation (CVs) for the derived MESF values on both dimly and brightly stained Fluorotrol populations were less than 2%. In 26 separate determinations over 14 weeks, the CVs of the derived MESF values were less than 3%. The MESF values of the dim and bright Fluorotrol populations derived from the microbead standard curves were both about 50% lower than those determined by direct spectrophotometric analysis of Fluorotrol. The analytical imprecision of fluorescence intensity measurements in this idealized model system has a CV less than 3%, and the analytical inaccuracy shows that calibration in MESF units remains uncertain over about a two‐fold range.