Premium
Temperature Impact on Perovskite Solar Cells Under Operation
Author(s) -
Mesquita Isabel,
Andrade Luísa,
Mendes Adélio
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
chemsuschem
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.412
H-Index - 157
eISSN - 1864-564X
pISSN - 1864-5631
DOI - 10.1002/cssc.201802899
Subject(s) - energy conversion efficiency , perovskite (structure) , materials science , chemical engineering , mesoporous material , thermal stability , photovoltaic system , open circuit voltage , solar cell , perovskite solar cell , evaporation , analytical chemistry (journal) , nanotechnology , chemistry , optoelectronics , organic chemistry , catalysis , electrical engineering , physics , voltage , engineering , thermodynamics
Abstract Perovskite solar cells (PSC) have emerged as a promising substitute for conventional silicon panels, showing the fastest power conversion efficiency evolution within the photovoltaic field, going from 3.8 % to 23.7 % in a few years. However, PSC thermal stability is still an obstacle to their commercialization. In this study, the temperature effect on mesoporous triple‐cation perovskite solar cells with two different hole extraction materials—2,2′,7,7′‐tetrakis( N , N ‐di‐ p ‐methoxyphenylamine)‐9,9′‐spirobifluorene (spiro‐OMeTAD) and poly[bis(4‐phenyl)(2,4,6‐trimethylphenyl)amine] (PTAA)—is assessed. The cells are exposed to thermal stress between −5 °C and 80 °C and their photovoltaic performance is monitored in situ to reproduce real operating conditions. At low temperatures, the devices present very stable values (average loss <5 %), but as the temperature increases significant decreases in the open circuit potential and short‐circuit current are observed. X‐ray diffraction shows no change in the perovskite crystal structure with temperature. However, electron scanning microscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy indicate that temperature has a great impact on the hole extraction layer. The cell performance loss is attributed to the evaporation of additives added to the hole extraction layer to enhance its conductivity. Although the decrease in power conversion efficiency at 80 °C is slightly higher for PTAA cells, spiro‐OMeTAD cells present a higher irreversible loss of (21.6±2.3) % after thermal stress tests, whereas PTAA devices showed only a loss of (8.2±1.6) %.