Premium
Ionic‐Liquid‐Assisted Microwave Synthesis of Solid Solutions of Sr 1− x Ba x SnO 3 Perovskite for Photocatalytic Applications
Author(s) -
Alammar Tarek,
Slowing Igor I.,
Anderegg Jim,
Mudring AnjaVerena
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
chemsuschem
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.412
H-Index - 157
eISSN - 1864-564X
pISSN - 1864-5631
DOI - 10.1002/cssc.201700615
Subject(s) - photocatalysis , nanorod , orthorhombic crystal system , crystallite , materials science , nanocrystalline material , band gap , crystal structure , perovskite (structure) , crystallization , ionic liquid , crystallography , analytical chemistry (journal) , chemical engineering , chemistry , nanotechnology , catalysis , engineering , biochemistry , optoelectronics , chromatography
Nanocrystalline Sr 1− x Ba x SnO 3 ( x =0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1) perovskite photocatalysts were prepared by microwave synthesis in an ionic liquid (IL) and subsequent heat‐treatment. The influence of the Sr/Ba substitution on the structure, crystallization, morphology, and photocatalytic efficiency was investigated and the samples were fully characterized. On the basis of X‐ray diffraction results, as the Ba content in the SrSnO 3 lattice increases, a symmetry increase was observed from the orthorhombic perovskite structure for SrSnO 3 to the cubic BaSnO 3 structure. The analysis of the sample morphology by SEM reveals that the Sr 1− x Ba x SnO 3 samples favor the formation of nanorods (500 nm–5 μm in diameter and several micrometers long). The photophysical properties were examined by UV/Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. The band gap decreases from 3.85 to 3.19 eV with increasing Ba 2+ content. Furthermore, the photocatalytic properties were evaluated for the hydroxylation of terephthalic acid (TA). The order of the activities for TA hydroxylation was Sr 0.8 Ba 0.2 SnO 3 >SrSnO 3 >BaSnO 3 >Sr 0.6 Ba 0.4 SnO 3 >Sr 0.2 Ba 0.8 SnO 3 . The highest photocatalytic activity was observed for Sr 0.8 Ba 0.2 SnO 3 , and this can be attributed to the synergistic impacts of the modification of the crystal structure and morphology, the relatively large surface area associated with the small crystallite size, and the suitable band gap and band‐edge position.