Premium
Determination of Interfacial Charge‐Transfer Rate Constants in Perovskite Solar Cells
Author(s) -
Pydzińska Katarzyna,
Karolczak Jerzy,
Kosta Ivet,
TenaZaera Ramon,
Todinova Anna,
Idígoras Jesus,
Anta Juan A.,
Ziółek Marcin
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
chemsuschem
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.412
H-Index - 157
eISSN - 1864-564X
pISSN - 1864-5631
DOI - 10.1002/cssc.201600210
Subject(s) - perovskite (structure) , dielectric spectroscopy , charge (physics) , reaction rate constant , spectroscopy , iodide , electron transfer , chemistry , chemical physics , electron , recombination , mesoporous material , ultrafast laser spectroscopy , materials science , analytical chemistry (journal) , photochemistry , inorganic chemistry , electrode , crystallography , catalysis , kinetics , physics , electrochemistry , biochemistry , quantum mechanics , chromatography , gene
A simple protocol to study the dynamics of charge transfer to selective contacts in perovskite solar cells, based on time‐resolved laser spectroscopy studies, in which the effect of bimolecular electron–hole recombination has been eliminated, is proposed. Through the proposed procedure, the interfacial charge‐transfer rate constants from methylammonium lead iodide perovskite to different contact materials can be determined. Hole transfer is faster for CuSCN (rate constant 0.20 ns −1 ) than that for 2,2′,7,7′‐tetrakis‐( N , N ‐di‐4‐methoxyphenylamino)‐9,9′‐spirobifluorene (spiro‐OMeTAD; 0.06 ns −1 ), and electron transfer is faster for mesoporous (0.11 ns −1 ) than that for compact (0.02 ns −1 ) TiO 2 layers. Despite more rapid charge separation, the photovoltaic performance of CuSCN cells is worse than that of spiro‐OMeTAD cells; this is explained by faster charge recombination in CuSCN cells, as revealed by impedance spectroscopy. The proposed direction of studies should be one of the key strategies to explore efficient hole‐selective contacts as an alternative to spiro‐OMeTAD.