On water‐use efficiency, boundary functions, and yield gaps: French and Schultz insight and legacy

This article is part of a series of brief commentaries to highlight papers that have resulted in important and distinctly new perspectives in crop science. Here, we outline a series of two papers by French and Schultz (F&S) on water use efficiency of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) published in 1984. The insight of F&S was not to draw a regression line across their yield‐evapotranspiration data. Instead they saw an upper limit of 20 kg ha −1  mm −1 that, less than a decade after publication, was widely used by Australian farmers to benchmark their crops and identify causes of yield gaps. Over the last two decades, F&S‐type benchmarks have been expanded beyond wheat and beyond Australia to include sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) in Argentina, maize ( Zea mays L.) and wheat in the United States and China, and millet [ Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] in West Africa, among others. More recently, the concept of yield gap analysis based on a upper limit of yield per unit resource uptake has been successfully extrapolated to N. The N uptake per millimeter of water required to meet the water‐limited yield potential (0.65 kg N ha −1  mm −1 under their original conditions) is a hidden insight in the work of French and Schultz; it has been recently rediscovered in the context of crop improvement, co‐limitation theory, and drought‐induced N deficit. Perhaps more deeply, French and Schultz shifted farmers mindset from the mildly fatalistic idea of “drought” to the notion that many other factors were typically limiting crop yield, and the quantitative challenge of attaining a plausible benchmark.