Open AccessPeriodontal status and the efficacy of the first‐line treatment of major depressive disorder
Author(s) -
Jelavić Silvana,
Bajić Žarko,
Filipčić Ivona Šimunović,
Čulina Ivana Jurčić,
Filipčić Igor,
Aurer Andrej
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
clinical and experimental dental research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.464
H-Index - 9
ISSN - 2057-4347
DOI - 10.1002/cre2.492
Subject(s) - medicine , major depressive disorder , depression (economics) , quality of life (healthcare) , prospective cohort study , rating scale , psychiatry , psychology , developmental psychology , nursing , economics , macroeconomics , amygdala
Abstract Objectives The efficacy of treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) is not satisfactory. Systemic inflammation may play an important role in MDD pathogenesis and treatment outcomes. Periodontal disease is the systemic inflammatory condition. Its prevalence may be as high as 45%. We aimed to assess the association of periodontal status with the outcome of 3‐month first‐line treatment of MDD with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Material and Methods We performed the prospective cohort study during 2018/2019 at Psychiatric Hospital “Sveti Ivan,” Croatia, on a consecutive sample of 43 patients. The outcome was the MDD symptoms severity measured using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale‐17. The periodontal status was indicated by the clinical attachment loss (CAL). Results Baseline periodontal status had a nonlinear significant and clinically relevant association with the MDD treatment outcome ( R 2 change of the quadratic term = 0.12; p = 0.027). In patients with good baseline periodontal status the severity of MDD symptoms was significantly improved. When the value of CAL was ≥4.44 mm, indicating the worse periodontal status, further increase in baseline CAL was associated with the worsening of MDD treatment outcomes independently of the baseline depression severity and 14 sociodemographic and clinical predictors of treatment outcome. Conclusions Periodontal healthcare is accessible, and should be utilize in an integrative, multidisciplinary approach not only for the sake of psychiatric patients' quality of life and prevention of periodontal disease, but for the sake of the outcomes of psychiatric treatment as well.