Open AccessCleaning effect of osteoconductive powder abrasive treatment on explanted human implants and biofilm‐coated titanium discs
Author(s) -
Tastepe Ceylin S.,
Lin Xingnan,
Werner Arie,
Donnet Marcel,
Wismeijer Daniel,
Liu Yuelian
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
clinical and experimental dental research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.464
H-Index - 9
ISSN - 2057-4347
DOI - 10.1002/cre2.100
Subject(s) - materials science , abrasive , scanning electron microscope , coating , titanium , erythritol , biofilm , peri implantitis , nuclear chemistry , composite material , metallurgy , chemistry , implant , surgery , food science , biology , bacteria , genetics , medicine
The aim of this study is to test the cleaning effect and surface modification of a new implant surface treatment on explanted dental implants and titanium discs. It is a modified air powder abrasive (APA) treatment applied using osteoconductive powders. Twenty‐eight in vitro Ca‐precipitated organic film‐coated titanium discs and 13 explanted dental implants were treated. In a 2‐step approach, 3 powders were used: hydroxylapatite (HA) and biomimetic calcium phosphate (BioCaP), which are osteoconductive, and erythritol, which is not. APA treatment was applied. (Air pressure: 2.4 bar; water flow for cleaning: 41.5 ml/min, for Coating 1: 2.1 ml/min, and for Coating 2: 15.2 ml/min.) The test groups were as follows: Group 1: HA cleaning + BioCaP Coating 1; Group 2: HA cleaning + BioCaP Coating 2; Group 3: erythritol cleaning + BioCaP Coating 1; Group 4: erythritol cleaning + BioCaP Coating 2; Group 5: HA cleaning; Group 6: erythritol cleaning; and control: no powder. Cleaned areas were calculated by point counting method. Surface changes and chemical content were evaluated using light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy. Cleaning effect between groups was compared by a pairwise Student's t test. The significance level was fixed at p < .05. Cleaning effect on the discs was 100% in all test groups and 5% in the control. Powder particles in varying size and shape were embedded on the surface. All HA‐ or CaP‐treated surfaces showed Ca and P content but no surface damage. Calcified biofilm remnants were removed from the implant surface by the test groups, whereas in control groups, they remained. APA treatment with CaP and HA powders under clinically applicable pressure settings gives positive results in vitro; therefore, they could be promising when used in vivo.