Premium
Crystal structures of N1, N5‐dibenzoyltetrahydro‐4‐methyl‐1, 5‐benzodiazepin‐2‐one (DBTBO) and tetrahydro‐4‐methyl‐1, 5‐benzodiazepin‐2‐one (TBO)
Author(s) -
Nallini A.,
Saraboji K.,
Ponnuswamy M. N.,
Venkatraj M.,
Jeyaraman R.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
crystal research and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.377
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1521-4079
pISSN - 0232-1300
DOI - 10.1002/crat.200410393
Subject(s) - monoclinic crystal system , chemistry , crystal structure , crystallography , stereochemistry , methyl group , group (periodic table) , organic chemistry
Adducing structural analogies between the two fused systems, N1, N5‐Dibenzoyltetrahydro‐4‐methyl‐1,5‐benzodiazepin‐2‐one, C 24 H 20 N 2 O 3 (DBTBO CCDC 200341) and Tetrahydro‐4‐methyl‐1,5‐benzodiazepin‐2‐one, C 10 H 12 N 2 O (TBO CCDC 200342) helps to find the pharmacological differences from the view point of variant hetero atom substitutions in the hetero cycle. Both the diazepines crystallized in identical monoclinic space group P2 1 /n with a = 14.1134(1) Å, b = 9.2444(1) Å, c = 16.3812(1) Å; β = 107.11(1)º, V = 2042.7(3) Å 3 for DBTBO and a = 9.3363(7) Å, b = 10.4895(8) Å, c = 9.9852(7) Å, β = 91.314(1)º, V = 977.62(1) Å 3 for TBO, respectively. The two structures were solved by direct methods and refined by full‐matrix least‐squares procedure to final R‐values of R1 = 0.0575(DBTBO) and R1 = 0.0984(TBO). Structural differences include non‐identical boat conformations of these seven‐membered rings and the different non‐bonding interactions in the benzodiazepine pair.