z-logo
Premium
Should recent experiences with CVOTs for oral hypoglycemic drugs allow us to rethink the regulatory paradigm?
Author(s) -
Meyer RJ
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.941
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1532-6535
pISSN - 0009-9236
DOI - 10.1002/cpt.193
Subject(s) - food and drug administration , rosiglitazone , medicine , drug approval , drug , clinical trial , regulatory science , drug labeling , drug trial , intensive care medicine , diabetes mellitus , pharmacology , pathology , endocrinology
In response to a meta‐analysis raising significant concerns over the cardiovascular safety of rosiglitazone, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a draft guidance directing sponsors of novel diabetes drugs to address cardiovascular risk, including large outcomes trials. Regulatory experience supports that outcomes trials, absent a clear signal of risk, may add reassurance, but also have significant consequences. The FDA should finalize this guidance, taking into account the regulatory experience since 2008.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here