Premium
Development of Measures to Assess Personal Recovery in Young People Treated in Specialist Mental Health Services
Author(s) -
John Mary,
Jeffries Fiona W.,
AcunaRivera Marcela,
Warren Fiona,
Simonds Laura M.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
clinical psychology and psychotherapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.315
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1099-0879
pISSN - 1063-3995
DOI - 10.1002/cpp.1905
Subject(s) - mental health , psychology , anxiety , young adult , depression (economics) , clinical psychology , mental health service , perspective (graphical) , internal consistency , psychiatry , psychometrics , developmental psychology , artificial intelligence , computer science , economics , macroeconomics
Background Recovery has become a central concept in mental health service delivery, and several recovery‐focused measures exist for adults. The concept's applicability to young people's mental health experience has been neglected, and no measures yet exist. Aim The aim of this work is to develop measures of recovery for use in specialist child and adolescent mental health services. Method On the basis of 21 semi‐structured interviews, three recovery measures were devised, one for completion by the young person and two for completion by the parent/carer. Two parent/carer measures were devised in order to assess both their perspective on their child's recovery and their own recovery process. The questionnaires were administered to a UK sample of 47 young people (10–18 years old) with anxiety and depression and their parents, along with a measure used to routinely assess treatment progress and outcome and a measure of self‐esteem. Results All three measures had high internal consistency (alpha ≥ 0.89). Young people's recovery scores were correlated negatively with scores on a measure used to routinely assess treatment progress and outcome ( r = −0.75) and positively with self‐esteem ( r = 0.84). Parent and young persons' reports of the young person's recovery were positively correlated ( r = 0.61). Parent report of the young person's recovery and of their own recovery process were positively correlated ( r = 0.75). Conclusion The three measures have the potential to be used in mental health services to assess recovery processes in young people with mental health difficulties and correspondence with symptomatic improvement. The measures provide a novel way of capturing the parental/caregiver perspective on recovery and caregivers' own wellbeing. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Key Practitioner Message No tools exist to evaluate recovery‐relevant processes in young people treated in specialist mental health services. This study reports on the development and psychometric evaluation of three self‐report recovery‐relevant assessments for young people and their caregivers. Findings indicate a high degree of correspondence between young person and caregiver reports of recovery in the former. The recovery assessments correlate inversely with a standardized symptom‐focused measure and positively with self‐esteem.