Premium
A Machine Learning Approach for Metal Oxide Based Polymer Composites as Charge Selective Layers in Perovskite Solar Cells
Author(s) -
Yildirim Murat Onur,
Gok Elif Ceren,
Hemasiri Naveen Harindu,
Eren Esin,
Kazim Samrana,
Oksuz Aysegul Uygun,
Ahmad Shahzada
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
chempluschem
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.801
H-Index - 61
ISSN - 2192-6506
DOI - 10.1002/cplu.202100132
Subject(s) - pedot:pss , materials science , perovskite (structure) , conductive polymer , polythiophene , composite number , oxide , fabrication , composite material , metal , chemical engineering , polyaniline , polymer , nanotechnology , polymerization , metallurgy , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology , engineering
A library of metal oxide‐conjugated polymer composites was prepared, encompassing WO 3 ‐polyaniline (PANI), WO 3 ‐poly(N‐methylaniline) (PMANI), WO 3 ‐poly(2‐fluoroaniline) (PFANI), WO 3 ‐polythiophene (PTh), WO 3 ‐polyfuran (PFu) and WO 3 ‐poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) which were used as hole selective layers for perovskite solar cells (PSCs) fabrication. We adopted machine learning approaches to predict and compare PSCs performances with the developed WO 3 and its composites. For the evaluation of PSCs performance, a decision tree model that returns 0.9656 R 2 score is ideal for the WO 3 ‐PEDOT composite, while a random forest model was found to be suitable for WO 3 ‐PMANI, WO 3 ‐PFANI, and WO 3 ‐PFu with R 2 scores of 0.9976, 0.9968, and 0.9772 respectively. In the case of WO 3 , WO 3 ‐PANI, and WO 3 ‐PTh, a K‐Nearest Neighbors model was found suitable with R 2 scores of 0.9975, 0.9916, and 0.9969 respectively. Machine learning can be a pioneering prediction model for the PSCs performance and its validation.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom